57 Comments
User's avatar
Allen's avatar

The HIV/AIDS scandal serves as a crucial prototype for understanding the current COVID-19 operation and other manufactured health crises. It established a blueprint for using fear, manipulated statistics, and rigged testing methods to create the perception of a pandemic where none existed.

This model has been refined and amplified with each subsequent "health emergency," reaching its apex with the COVID-19 operation. The HIV/AIDS crisis demonstrated how a "disease" could be invented and sustained through media manipulation, rigged science, and financial incentives. It set the stage for future "pandemics" by establishing the methodology of using non-diagnostic tests to generate false positives, creating the illusion of widespread infection.

As early as 1949, Congressional bills which were introduced to abolish CDC because of the remarkable decline in "infectious disease" mortalities were twice won by impressive majorities. In 1994, Red Cross officer Paul Cummings told the San Francisco Chronicle that “The CDC increasingly needed a major epidemic” to justify its existence. The invention of the "AIDS Virus", and HIV/AIDS theory was salvation for American epidemic authorities.

James Curran, the Chief of the CDC’s Sexually Transmitted Diseases unit, described the desperation among the public health corps in the early 1980s: “There was double-digit inflation, very high unemployment, a rapid military buildup and a threat to decrease all domestic programs, and this led to workforce cuts at the Public Health Service, and particularly CDC.” They were hoping for a new plague. Polio was over. There were memos going around the agency saying, ‘We need to find the new plague’; ‘We need to find something to scare the American people so they will give us more money.’”

AIDS is not related to any "pathogen" but like other diseases is a by-product of biological systems being vaporized by toxic overload and multiple stressors. In the case of AIDS Inc. in the US and Europe, which became the raison d'etre for an embattled CDC and health industry, this biological meltdown was mainly due to massive drug use- amyl nitrite aka "poppers", cocaine, amphetamines, etc. in combination with severe and prolonged malnutrition and sleep deprivation.

The story was as follows- A deadly new virus is discovered. There's no treatment or cure. It's highly contagious. Everyone is a potential victim. The world is at risk from asymptomatic super spreaders. New clusters of “cases” are reported daily.

Everyone must get tested even though the tests are fraudulent. Positive antibody tests are called "infections" and "cases" even when the patient has no symptoms. Media hysteria kicks into high gear. Billions of dollars are authorized for fast track drug and vaccine research. Presumptive diagnoses are accompanied by exaggerated death statistics and falsified death certificates.

Sound familiar?

Expand full comment
xkry's avatar

It appears this is a template established even earlier with polio, syphilis, and possibly other "germ"-based diseases. Bogus tests, crappy poisonous "treatments", nonsense "vaccines". It's a really old scam.

Expand full comment
Ruth Pelzer's avatar

Excellent. Beautifully articulated. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Don't drink the Kool-Aid's avatar

Obviously there's still a lot of denial regarding the Hepatitis B experimental vaccine in the United States in 1978-79 as the cause of "AIDS" in gay men.

~

99% of all discussions about the origins of "HIV" and "AIDS" in gay men prefer to IGNORE the elephant in the room, namely, the 1978-79 *experimental* Hepatitis B vaccine program, sponsored by N.I.H. in America's cities, which used EXCLUSIVELY promiscuous gay men as its lab rats. Monogamous/celibate volunteers were rejected.

~

Within a few MONTHS, the EXACT same demographic (promiscuous gay men in U.S. cities) began dropping dead like flies in 1980.

~

The behavior of gay men did NOT suddenly change in 1979. Behavior was the same in 1979 as it was in the decade of the 1970s, with many gay men druggin' and drinkin' and screwin' around with multiple partners, while many other gay men did not do these things. Therefore one cannot blame cases of "AIDS" on behavior or a change in behavior.

~

Note that AZT/Revtrovir/azidothymidine was not permitted until about 1985. Therefore, one cannot blame the thousands of "AIDS" deaths in the years from 1980 to 1985 on AZT as it was NOT available yet: "In February 1985, NCI scientists found that AZT had potent efficacy in vitro.[37][54] Several months later, a Phase I clinical trial of AZT was initiated ..."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zidovudine#History

~

Hardly anyone ever even considers the experimental Hep B vaccine as the likely culprit. Certainly not the ridiculous mainstream narrative, i.e., claiming that "AIDS" originated in Africa from hunters eating green monkeys, LOL. And then you have the "Tier-2" people like Duesberg (and you Allen!) claiming "AIDS" is not caused by "HIV" but may be caused by ingesting toxic doses of drugs like AZT, poppers, or by living a druggy lifestyle of coke, meth, malnutrition, too much partying, etc..

~

Allen, you wrote "this biological meltdown was mainly due to massive drug use- amyl nitrite aka "poppers", cocaine, amphetamines, etc. in combination with severe and prolonged malnutrition and sleep deprivation."

~

By fixating on a false binary, namely that "AIDS" is either caused by "HIV" or by AZT/poppers/coke/meth overdosage, BOTH Tier-1 and Tier-2 have missed the main point (the elephant in the room) in that neither takes into consideration *WHAT WAS TRULY NEW* at the time in 1978-79, which was the Hep B vaccine for gay men, the EXACT demographic that starting dropping dead like flies within months of the experimental shots!!!

~

https://merylnass.substack.com/p/monkeypox-and-jynneos-a-sordid-history/comment/65850806

~

P.S. And just to be perfectly clear, the recipients of the *commercial* Hepatitis B vax product by Merck (approved *later* by FDA for health care workers) did NOT start dropping dead. I suppose the Merck product was missing the special, secret deadly N.I.H. ingredient.

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

What about the hemophilia people? And why do they still give pills?

Expand full comment
Korpijarvi's avatar

> The HIV/AIDS scandal serves as a crucial prototype for understanding the current COVID-19 operation and other manufactured health crises.

Precisely correct and the most important point to try to get through the fear-and-propaganda-stewed minds of most people...

...especially the degreed midwits who think that agreeing with/conforming to the diktats of the Expert Class and inflicting it on others gives them a share in the Nobelista juju.

CDC was founded for a particular mission, and when that ended, went looking for new "viruses" from which their priesthood could save humanity.

In Jan. of 2020, when I learned that Tony Fauci was the point-clown for "covid," it told me everything I needed to know about what was happening.

But you have to admit, Allen, many people sure do appear to hunger for Infection, Doom, Chastisement, and Salvation. The mythic complex inside/behind all this is robust. And the people who have known how to tap into/exploit it have done so at great profit to themselves.

Expand full comment
Gene's avatar

I do agree. There is no HIV. However, there is a question: If something called AIDS does exist and is indeed a disease, then what causes it, and is it contagious? If the causes are related to the individual's conditions and the so-called AIDS isn't infectious, then all respective tests are invalid, i.e., fraud across the world.

Expand full comment
John Wantling's avatar

There are no contagious diseases. I suggest that you search for a scientific reference proving one human or animal can infect another human or animal. You will be searching for the rest of your life. That reference has never been written. Read the book WHAT REALLY MAKES YOU ILL by David Parker and Dawn Lester. Read my article on the CRAZZ FILES website titled MORRISONS SUPERMARKET COVID SIMULATION EVENT by John Wantling. I also have an as yet unfinished DRAFT I can send you.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

The symptoms combined into a syndrome called AIDS, of course, exist. Weight loss, KS, tiredness, lymphadenopathy etc. They are not caused by the same things in starving Africans as they are in gay men taking now banned brands of poppers or having lots of receptive anal sex. The tests are, of course, invalid because proteins involved have never been correlated with symptoms.

https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

There's no such thing as AIDS. They made it up to suit the needs of the pharma industry and the medical cartel.

It is fraud across the world- it's racketeering.

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

Is there anything in the medical regime that isn't a hoax? I think not.

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar

No there is not. And this innocent little statement of yours says quite a lot.

Expand full comment
The Opinionist High Quality Opinions's avatar

This was REALLY difficult for me to read because this lie was the beginning of my husband's death and in my opinion, the cause of it. We were soul mates, which I didn't think I'd ever find, especially at age 40 and having already given birth to three children.

The first time I was tested for "HIV" was in Manhattan, in 1982. It was called HTLVlll back then. I used to read about non mainstream "HIV" news, on the last page of SPIN Magazine in the 80s. My tests were always on the borderline between positive and negative. I stopped believing the bs. I was forced to test by my methadone clinic in New York.

I moved to Italy in 1997 and almost immediately met my late husband (had just gotten rid of the jerk I was married to before him). He was a long time heroin addict like I was. He had Hep B and C and supposedly also "HIV." Since 1990.

Well, everything was fine and dandy and neither of us were EVER sick with even colds, until 2012. At that point, his infectivologist here in Milano told him that if he refused to take the "HIV therapy" (😡), he'd be cut off from all health care at the hospital. She said he obviously didn't care about himself, so why should they care about him? We had no internet before 2012. We had no access to second opinions online and all doctors here are 'with the program.' Against his will and with ZERO SYMPTOMS OF ANYTHING, he started the so called therapy with Truvada and another drug that I have written down, but I don't feel like looking for it right now.

Anyway, not even six months had passed when he was diagnosed with anal cancer. Both of us instinctively KNEW it was the damn "therapy" that had done it. He was told he couldn't stop the therapy because it was too dangerous for his compromised liver.

Two years of radiation treatment later, he was dead. I've been emotionally dead since then myself.

I found out about the CDC's secret wing (don't remember the name and afraid to lose what I've written in order to find it) that pushes these lies only four years ago, despite my having been in the truth environment since 2012. Didn't get our first internet at home or on our phones until 2012 and we were out and about, living our lives and I'd long since forgotten about SPIN Magazine and what I'd read so long ago.

Anyway, I blame our lack of information about the "HIV fraud" for his death and I HEAVILY blame the specific doctor and hospital in Milano for killing the love of my life. Even now, I have people look at me like I'm crazy when I tell them that "HIV" doesn't exist. Before I forget, let me say that the ONLY so called symptom of anything that my late husband ever had was a CD4 count of 250. That alone was enough for him to be threatened to "take the therapy or you'll lose all health care at this hospital."

I REALLY, REALLY, APOLOGIZE for this super long comment!!!!! I read your post and everything came rushing back to me. Writing this is my way of not only confirming every word you've written, but it's also my way of saying that posts like yours can literally save lives!! If we'd had access to this article back then, there's no way on earth he'd have started that poison "therapy"!!! My name is Jennifer. I can't thank you enough for writing this!! I hope you were able to get through this "War and Peace" length comment. For the sake of people who really don't know the truth, the more you write about the "HIV fraud", the better!!! Again, I can't thank you enough for this!!!!! Ciao!! 🙂

PS - my across the hall neighbors in Manhattan in the 80s were a gay couple who were heavily into the nightlife scene. One of them was my eldest daughter's godfather. Both of them eventually died with an AIDS diagnosis. Both of them had the classic symptoms that are on all the "AIDS symptoms" lists. My late husband didn't have even ONE symptom and he was a hetero dope fiend. It's been about 38 years since my two friends in New York died and I still think about them and what they were put through, on a regular basis.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

Yes, the effects of AZT and other treatments themselves were indeed cited as AIDS and many beautiful men died because of this lie. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/influencers-in-health-freedom-please?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
An Observer (Teresa L)'s avatar

Thank you so much for this succinct article!

"AIDS" was a template for "COVID".

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

This is a good documentary that supports your argument. There were people who suspected that the inhalers (called “poppers) were the problem, along with what is described as the “fast lane homosexual lifestyle”.

They were heavily advertised in magazines oriented toward homosexuals. They tried to get the magazines to not advertise poppers. But popper ads were the magazines primary source of financial support.

Even Montagnier came to question whether HIV existed - he was credited with discovering it. And if it did exist, he suspected it was harmless.

The sequence of events was a positive PCR for HIV. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR, said the PCR is inappropriate for using as a diagnostic tool. Person then prescribed AZT, a chemotherapy drug whose trials were stopped because of the number of deaths it caused. The AZT killed the person who was healthy.

https://www.brasscheck.com/video/aids-faucis-first-fraud/

Expand full comment
Rod Knoll's avatar

Nah....Kary Mullis NEVER said what you claim he said. I MET Mullis a few times, and he was NO HERO for us old "AIDS" dissidents! Please take the time to learn the truth. Mullis was as much of a FRAUD as the so-called "PCR" which he most likely did NOT "invent"! He was a FRAUD both as a so-called "scientist" and when he was PRETENDING to be a so-called "dissident".

PLEASE SEE:

1. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fbpYott1Mdw_BuuiE6_rjO_7Xr5Z_PdoxtK3fNZI9Gc

My own analyses of Mullis from my substack are at these links:

2. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/the-mullis-mirage

3. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/was-mullis-more-machiavellian-than

Also, MULLIS WAS NOT KILLED by Fauci or anyone else for that matter! SEE:

4. https://longtimedissident.substack.com/p/new-kary-mullis-was-not-killed-by

Jamie Andrews agrees with me about Mullis, and he has written this great critical analysis of Mullis' book:

5. https://controlstudies.substack.com/p/kary-mullis-dancing-naked-in-the

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

He absolutely said it. It’s on video. It may have contradicted other statements he made. But to say “never” is simply wrong.

Apparently, you don’t know enough about the PCR - I just read the first link. Kary Mullis said that the genetic sequence used in it was only partial. And that sequence could appear anywhere, even in organs. So a “positive” result could easily be meaningless.

That’s why it can’t be used as a diagnostic tool. To do so requires knowing that the sequence used DOES NOT appear anywhere else. That’s impossible to prove.

Appears to me, you have your own agenda / crusade. Don’t know enough to comment on your hypothesis.

But for crying out loud, don’t mischaracterize someone’s statements about their own invention. That reflects sloppy thinking.

I read some of the other links. I litigated patents. A federal judge said that he hated patent cases. Instead of arguing their case, the attorneys frequently just name called and character assassinated opposing counsel. Both sides did it.

That’s easier than actually proving your case in understandable terms.

You made the same fundamental mistake. And then misstated facts.

If I can’t trust you to state facts accurately, why would I trust anything else you say.

Expand full comment
Rod Knoll's avatar

FFS! Who the F are YOU???!!! As I already stated, I WAS THERE! I HEARD MULLIS SPEAK IN PERSON FFS a FEW TIMES! Mullis NEVER used the "D" word, as in "PCR *CANNOT* be used to **DIAGNOSE**" ANYTHING! Once again, Mullis NEVER said or wrote THAT!! In fact, Mullis emphasized the OPPOSITE at every opportunity! YOU are the one who is WRONG and YOU NEED TO BE IGNORED!!

*****IF ENGLISH IS NOT YOUR NATIVE LANGUAGE, THEN WTF ARE YOU DOING TRYING TO DISCUSS THESE HIGHLY TECHNICAL ISSUES....???!!!****

In the time you took to reply to me, you could not POSSIBLY have read EVERYTHING, certainly not even all the LINKS that are contained in the FIRST link I PROVIDED!! That FIRST document I linked CLEARLY SHOWS that MULLIS WAS AN ABSOLUTE FRAUD!! You are clearly just some ANONYMOUS TROLL!! Also, there is NO so-called "DNA" FFS!! GET A FREAKIN' CLUE you NIMROD!! Or just STFU about stuff when you CLEARLY KNOW NOTHING about these issues!

Expand full comment
Rod Knoll's avatar

The moron who goes by the profile name of "Brother Strawberry" is a FUCKING IDIOT! I have engaged with him MANY TIMES, yet he remains DENSE! Aldhissla should NOT allow these MORONS to comment on his posts, but he is much more polite than I would ever be! Anyone with half a brain can look at my susbtack, read my substack posts and learn the TRUTH about that fucking SCUMBAG KARY MULLIS from someone (ME) who actually MET the prick!

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

I don’t know the sequence of events.

Did they start giving the AZT before the PCR test was available or they measured the AZT effect by using the PCR test?

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

Watch the documentary I linked to. It may help. AIDS existed. It was later said that it was caused by HIV - it was a lie. There’s no proof. There’s plenty of evidence that lifestyle played a part. Excessive taking of antibiotics can cause it. The “fast lane homosexual lifestyle” means lots of sexual partners, frequent STDs (which are treated with antibiotics) and I think taking poppers in nightclubs.

The PCR was used to “detect” that a person had HIV. Like Covid, you could have no symptoms and test positive. This contradicts all medicine - you’re not sick if you have no symptoms.

AZT was created as a chemotherapy cancer treatment. Its clinical trials were stopped because it killed so many. Somehow - I don’t know how - AZT was released to “treat” a positive HIV test so as to prevent a person from getting AIDS.

Think it’s been pretty well established that the AZT gave the person AIDS. Having AIDS is similar to having metabolic syndrome. Certain blood parameters are off in a particular way that’s defined as “AIDS”. These parameters differed from country to country. A person could have AIDS in country A but not have it in country B.

The reality was many of the people who tested positive for HIV were never going to get AIDS. But they were treated with AZT. And then were said to have died from AIDS.

Arthur Ashe said that he thought it was the AZT that was killing him. Many of those who died “from AIDS” were on AZT.

A chemotherapy drug destroys your immune system. The chemotherapy theory is it kills the cancer before it kills you. That’s why chemotherapy is administered for a limited period.

If you watch The Dallas Buyers Club, they told people to stop taking AZT because it was poison. Also, in the movie, it’s shown that the study regarding AZT was being rigged - you have to pay attention to catch it. They were giving the AZT recipients blood transfusions.

PCR was only used for supposedly detecting HIV. Just like it was used to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2 the cause of Covid. Again you could “have it” despite no symptoms.

Similar to AIDS, a positive PCR for SARS-CoV-2 was treated with Remdesivir. Another drug whose clinical trials were stopped because of the harm it caused to the recipients. Kidney failure was frequent. Yet, Fauci got it released to treat a positive test result.

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

What I asking is specific:

1) How did anybody think to give the AZT pills in the first place?

2) Why would anybody think the AZT would help the T cells?

3) What were they measuring to judge if the AZT was helping, the T cells or the PCR “copy number”?

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

I don’t know. Those are good questions. Don’t think any of it was done.

I don’t think the PCR was used for evaluating progression. Only the “presence”.

Am aware that Fauci led homosexuals (an at risk group) to think that there was a “treatment” that the government was holding up. They were tricked into demanding it. It was AZT.

Those same questions would be good ones for Remdesivir for Covid. Not aware of any such analysis for that one either.

Because so many patients commonly died after Remdesivir, it was nicknamed

“Run Death Is Near”.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

I think it's the reverse. The antibody test was used for presence and the PCR for viral load ie progression. Although both, of course, are non specific. Yes, they created a demand for AZT by pretending to withhold it - just like they did with IVM. There were a few trials done on HCQ, at high doses, on 'covid' but I don't remember them for Remdesivir, which is some sort of 'anti-viral' drug? We had midazolam instead in the UK which is not meant to do anything but give a 'good death'.

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

You’re wrong. Only the PCR was used. And the cycles used were not provided on the test.

Fauci said 25 cycles would provide over 90% false positives.

They were using over 35 cycles.

PCR can’t be used to measure progression because it multiplies whatever they’re looking for.

PCR is a research tool.

To compare AZT to Ivermectin is silly. My dog’s heartworm has ivermectin as the active ingredient.

Some say ivermectin causes sterility. That’s why it was promoted as the “improper alternative”.

Remdesivir was created to treat Ebola. It harmed too many people and its clinical trials were halted.

I don’t think Covid existed. They just called the flu “Covid”. Statistics support me. Around 70,000 people die from the flu annually.

But almost nobody got the flu during covid.

Also, during the alleged “pandemic”, the mortality rate actually dropped. It spiked after the vaccines were introduced.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

The PCR is not used to test for 'AIDs' because there are too many 'genomes'. The presence of antibody (which should indicate 'immunity'?) to p24 is the only test. Or in the absence of it, weight loss. Or if the test is unexpectedly negative on patient history of blood transfusion, being a black African or a gay man.

Fauci used his failed chemotherapy drug AZT to treat the 'virus' 'early and hard' as Ho said.

There is no link between ‘HIV’ ‘viral load’ (number of PCR cycles for a non existent virus ) and CD4 count, nor is there correlation with having ‘AIDS’ and abnormal CD4 counts. There is some evidence that AZT (which is highly oxidizing) destroyed the sequences that the PCR was primed to amplify making it look effective. After the introduction of AZT AIDS parameters were expanded to include healthy people with positive HIV tests, those with mild to moderate disease, those with TB, cervical cancer, lymphadenopathy, healthy people with CD4 counts below 200 and people with negative tests or no test with any indicator such as weight loss. When these people diagnosed with ‘AIDS’, though healthy or with other conditions, died their deaths would not be recorded as AIDS, thus it appeared that introduction of AZT reduced the death rate from AIDS. Even if AZT killed every patient treated with it, it would still appear that AZT had decreased the death rate from ‘HIV’. AZT did in fact kill nearly everyone treated with it.

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

The PCR was never used to test for AIDS. AIDS is a condition much like metabolic syndrome.

If certain biological markers are out of spec in particular ways, the condition is called “AIDS”.

Countries differed in what the proper values of the parameters were. You could have AIDS in country A and NOT have AIDS in country B.

Expand full comment
M W's avatar

Just saw this. Think you’ll find it interesting. They discuss the PCR and its inaccuracy. It was a money grab.

It doesn’t address your specific questions.

https://substack.com/@ggtvstreams/note/c-184832486?r=2fwxly&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action

Expand full comment
Pete Ross's avatar

OK, thanks!

Expand full comment
Allen's avatar
Dec 5Edited

Read, "The AIDS War: Propaganda, Profiteering and Genocide from the Medical-Industrial Complex", and "Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story", by John Lauritsen

You are asking questions based on medical reasoning but such racketeering operations do not compost with such models.

On February 19, 1988, Fauci appeared on the television program and when asked why only one drug, AZT, had been made available. He replied:

"The reason why only one drug has been made available — AZT — is because it’s the only drug that has been shown in scientifically controlled trials to be safe and effective.“

Fauci's job is to provide a path for Big Pharma to own the government regulatory agencies- he's the bag man.

Sound familiar?

AZT, the first federally approved AIDS treatment, was authorized on the basis of a fraudulent clinical trial as documented in John Lauritsen’s essential book Poison by Prescription: The AZT Story which can be read at the following link: PoisonByPrescription

https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B62XEB2T2Y7pdFBZSGEtZzhKemM/view?resourcekey=0-NdAAHw1JxkYnaKhGIfh3JQ

Go here:

https://actuparchives.com/tag/azt/

And here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xXyUf_cqHQ0&t=3s

Expand full comment
Ruth Pelzer's avatar

Wonderfully written. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Warren Ross's avatar

Peter Duesberg explained this. He talks about Kary Mullis meeting Luc Montagnier at a public function and asking him where he could find Montagnier’s proof that he isolated the HIV virus. Montagnier could not get away fast enough.

Expand full comment
Barca's avatar

Those Nitrites are also immunosuppressives, and they were taken by people who were introducing a mind boggling amount of viruses/bacteria into their bodies in very risky ways.

Expand full comment
Swapnil Nikumbh's avatar

in an interview with djamel tahi montagnier answering question 14 says “For example, one day I had a very fine peak of RT, which F Barre-Sinoussi gave me, with 'a density a little bit higher, 1.19' and I checked! 'It was a mycoplasma', not a retrovirus”.

How is it then possible for Montagnier to say that 'RT is specific to retroviruses'?

Detecting RT in different density band, a bit higher density band that is 1.19, and finding mycoplasma in that band (by montagnier himself) leaves RT as not only non specific to so called retroviruses, but also invalidates RT to be used as 'surrogate marker', given it can be detected in any density band and attributed as specific to anything found in that density band.

Expand full comment
An Observer (Teresa L)'s avatar

Good point.

Expand full comment
zzz's avatar

It's always been the vaccines that deliver the ailment while under the guise of being medicinal.

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

There is no vaccine for AIDS, but the cure, AZT, was the cause in many cases.

Expand full comment
Johnno's avatar

I agree with your theory that this was a construct instead of a disease, but a number of assumptions made about the life of gay men who died are wrong.

Less than 30% of the populace used amyl nitrate in their lives, and less than 5% used Cocaine and other major drugs as stimulants.

Most of the people I knew who died with an AIDS diagnosis fit into the majority I have described with no drug use and no reason for immunity to be compromised.

Alongside the amyl nitrate hypothesis, one must also remember that most AIDS patients did not develop Kaposi's Sarcoma, despite Hollywood using it in every movie about those times.

The alternative view is still skewed away from my experience of the scene in Sydney and London during the years of excessive death rates.

The entire story of AIDS has not yet been told in a way which explains the deaths of thousands of young men in the 80's and 90's in a way in which I experienced it.

Yes there were hard liners who used anything to enhance a state of trance on the dance floor or in bed, but that accounts for only about 1% of the population.

Most who died were ordinary people with no expensive habits or addictions.

I stopped counting after losing 43 good friends, cleaning out my social world into one of isolation.

I cannot calmly read assumptions which do not fit the general experiential reality suggesting that they were all set addicts using multiple substances to reach a higher state of enjoyment.

Expand full comment
Dr.Don Hall's avatar

The Hoax was discovered, shut down and covered up. 50 years later The Hoax for vaxx, virus and freedom is Center Stage for those who can still read.

Expand full comment
Kenneth J Hinnenkamp's avatar

Virology is pseudoscience. Vaccines are bioweapons. Dr. Paul Thomas found his unvaxxed patients were healthier than his vaxxed patients.

https://a.co/d/bnrKDfn

Expand full comment
Jo Waller's avatar

My version of the AIDS hoax and homage to the Perth Group https://jowaller.substack.com/p/the-importance-of-intellectual-freedom

Jo x

Expand full comment
Brother🍓 Strawberry's avatar

The “free love” hippie era of the 1960s-70s brought about a coming together of the people that opposed war and government corruption.

The hippies, youth and homosexual communities that were previously mocked and scorned were recognized as powerful, influential forces.

The powers that shouldn’t be theorized a supposed sexually transmitted phantom into existence to scapegoat as The blame for clusters of deaths occurring in a distinct subculture that practiced immune suppressive lifestyle factors.

Instead of recognizing the multiple assaults to immune function as the problem, blame was cast on the “free love”.

All the power and political influence that the coming together of the people produced was thwarted by widespread promotion of this supposedly sexually transmitted phantom driving division, distrust and ofear instead of togetherness and free love.

All the Power Of The People was lost by allowing the fear driven, government promoted LIES of a sexually transmitted deadly phantom to divide We The People. Everyone became a potential deadly threat instead of a potential lover.

This method of psychological manipulation of the people has become increasingly more intense, varied and widespread.

EVERYTHING the government tells We The People is intended to cause division. Because what the government fears most is a coming together of We The People.

STOP FEARING PHANTOMS!

Stop being controlled by fear of phantoms.

COME TOGETHER! RIGHT NOW!

Expand full comment