11 Comments
Oct 25Liked by Aldhissla

"The section of the medical profession who subsequently accepted the contagion doctrine were people who gathered their information from the laboratory, not from clinical experience."

This ☝️ is such a big problem - the complete and unchecked deference to lab "specialists".

Specialists in labs with their petri dishes, tests and microscopes are so far removed from reality that their explanations end up really having no bearing on plainly observable facts. The fact that those who are in a position to observe reality completely ignore their own observations in favour of those observations made in a pseudo-reality is truly nonsensical. Clinical experience should really inform laboratory work and not the other way around.

Great article, thanks for your hard work.

Expand full comment
author

Thanks, well said!

Expand full comment
Oct 25·edited Oct 25Liked by Aldhissla

"In discussing this side of the question I will start out with the fundamental and self-evident proposition that, if other things are the same, those who are most exposed to a contagious disease are most liable to contract it. It is inevitable, therefore, that physicians, nurses and attendants of consumption hospitals, and intimate relatives of consumptive patients are more subject to the disease than those who are but seldom exposed. What are the facts?"

This is something that had never occurred to me because I never thought about it. But it became GLARINGLY obvious during COVID and you have to smack yourself in the head when you think about it in retrospect.

Not only the doctors and nurses and so on, but flight attendants, grocery store employees, bartenders, etc. any employment in which you share an enclosed area with upwards of hundreds to thousands of complete strangers every working day, should be getting sick with almost 100% certainty every year, with one of the myriad of purportedly infectious agents spreading amongst the public at any given time. If not 100%, an enormous and noticeably larger percentage of the time. Many of them, in fact, would get sick multiple times per year. (As per, say, someone who eats rotting or poisoned food on a regular basis would regularly get food poisoning, someone breathing in the "contaminated air" on a regular basis should regularly get the "air poisoning").

They then becoming "poisonous air factories", their entire households should likewise regularly and perhaps just chronically get sick.

And they don't. They don't get any sicker than anyone else. Not during COVID, not during flu season, not during nuthin'.

Expand full comment

No. During Covid they had enough time to create dance routines and have competitions within and between hospitals. I kept saying - “Why aren’t people dying in the streets? Why is the er parking lot empty? Shouldn’t we be hearing more ambulances? I’m not seeing old people wheeled out on gurneys around the neighborhood.” The whole thing was just so obvious to some of us. I don’t know how the majority could be captured so easily. Then I noticed that most of the people who got it were either convinced by family or they watched A LOT of television.

Expand full comment

Well researched & referenced (as always👍) Aldhissla.

And good news that "Internet Archive" is back up & running!

Expand full comment
author

Indeed 👍

Expand full comment

There have also been honest, sincere researchers in the past, to whom I would like to express my utmost appreciation. I would like to thank all those who have carried this honourable tradition into the present and who are currently upholding it.

At the same time, I would like to express my deepest contempt for so-called virology, its profiteers and all doctors who continue to be involved in the biggest fraud in human history.

Expand full comment

They name things to sell you expensive, ineffective treatment. Fraud in other words. You might like my podcast on reversing vaccine-induced autism.

Expand full comment

I live in an area where TB is at the highest levels in the world. Our university has one of the best TB research in the world. Your article leaves out a critical point which has been long established. Symptoms only develop in people who are immunocompromised. For example a patient who has an autoimmune disease who developed extra pulmonary TB. It’s a very real condition. Classic signs and symptoms plus CXR picture. They have recently started giving prophylaxis for contacts. You can deny it all you want, doesn’t change that we diagnose and treat. Without treatment these people die.

Expand full comment

No conflation, evidence clear cut on microscopy. Responds to same treatment predictably.

Expand full comment

You are it seems conflating two variables, independent and dependent the symptoms are not so much in question as the alleged cause. It is the symptoms that are being treated not the cause. Prophylactics? an apple a day keeps the doctor away?

Expand full comment