The genre of ViroLIEgy has inspired numerous works of fiction for the silver screen, including some major blockbusters, such as, the Spanish flu, HIV House of Horror, and, more recently, CONVID 19. Along the way, we‘ve been treated to some entertaining B movies like Silly Sars 1, Mythical Measles, and Monkeypox for Monkey Business. With such a ‘diverse‘ array of narratives available, there's truly something for everyone, as long as you remember that the genre of viroLIEgy is purely fictional.
Most people, if they deal with the topic at all, probably do not realise the explosive nature of the facts. If reverse transcriptase RT is not the sole characteristic of retro viral existence (assuming that viruses actually exist), then the answer can always be: there is a virus. Or not. Then virology can no longer go beyond the coin toss.
As a compelling consequence, the alleged recognition feature of RT must inevitably be abandoned. Then, instead of constantly looking at secondary phenomena, all that remains is to examine the object itself and not the "traces" it supposedly leaves behind.
Example: Footprints and blurred images FPBI are the only "proof of Bigfoot's existence". However, FPBI also exist from other species with feet, for example humans and apes. In this case, a footprint cannot be sufficient evidence. A bigfoot must be caught and examined. And until then, its existence is a legend, and trackers can only flip a coin to decide what they have found.
RT is only one criterion in which the discriminatory power within virology has been lost.
All the properties assigned to "viruses" are as blurred as the worst Bigfoot photos. Same with the alleged antibodies.
If you expect selectivity, clear rules and stable theories from a science, you are in the wrong place in virology.
Some viruses are called "retroviruses" because of the discovery of the reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme. When reverse transcriptase was first discovered it was presumed to be rare and thus the supposed viruses associated with reverse transcriptase were imagined to be different from other viruses. The prefix "retro" is another way of saying "reverse."
Since RT enzyme turns out not to be unusual or rare it seems like the entire basis for the existence of retroviruses is wrong, but no one seems interested in correcting the mistake.
The genre of ViroLIEgy has inspired numerous works of fiction for the silver screen, including some major blockbusters, such as, the Spanish flu, HIV House of Horror, and, more recently, CONVID 19. Along the way, we‘ve been treated to some entertaining B movies like Silly Sars 1, Mythical Measles, and Monkeypox for Monkey Business. With such a ‘diverse‘ array of narratives available, there's truly something for everyone, as long as you remember that the genre of viroLIEgy is purely fictional.
Great work gain, Aldhissla!!
Most people, if they deal with the topic at all, probably do not realise the explosive nature of the facts. If reverse transcriptase RT is not the sole characteristic of retro viral existence (assuming that viruses actually exist), then the answer can always be: there is a virus. Or not. Then virology can no longer go beyond the coin toss.
As a compelling consequence, the alleged recognition feature of RT must inevitably be abandoned. Then, instead of constantly looking at secondary phenomena, all that remains is to examine the object itself and not the "traces" it supposedly leaves behind.
Example: Footprints and blurred images FPBI are the only "proof of Bigfoot's existence". However, FPBI also exist from other species with feet, for example humans and apes. In this case, a footprint cannot be sufficient evidence. A bigfoot must be caught and examined. And until then, its existence is a legend, and trackers can only flip a coin to decide what they have found.
RT is only one criterion in which the discriminatory power within virology has been lost.
All the properties assigned to "viruses" are as blurred as the worst Bigfoot photos. Same with the alleged antibodies.
If you expect selectivity, clear rules and stable theories from a science, you are in the wrong place in virology.
Excellent article, thanks !
Please share this one, it will also help people to understand the problem :
https://odysee.com/@Gamzuletova:9/RESUMEN:4?r=2tjnZ4vtKeXZPAXKJDteZxXuxLp8ihz2
I got some comments that at min 15:30 Odysee stops the video. Interesting.
At that point starts an important part, so if that is the case, please download the video (you can do that on Odysee) and watch it offline.
Blessings
This was very informative and very clear. Thanks.
It helped to realize:
Some viruses are called "retroviruses" because of the discovery of the reverse transcriptase (RT) enzyme. When reverse transcriptase was first discovered it was presumed to be rare and thus the supposed viruses associated with reverse transcriptase were imagined to be different from other viruses. The prefix "retro" is another way of saying "reverse."
Since RT enzyme turns out not to be unusual or rare it seems like the entire basis for the existence of retroviruses is wrong, but no one seems interested in correcting the mistake.
Interesting!
Appreciation and blessings from Sydney Australia.